Другие материалы рубрики «English»
- Public Bologna Committee presents report on Belarus’ readiness to join European Higher Education Area
A group of Belarusian experts and civil society activists called the Public Bologna Committee presented an alternative report...
- NGO, opposition coalition launch campaign to monitor presidential election
An NGO pushing for democratic elections and an opposition alliance have announced the start of a joint campaign to monitor this year’s presidential election.
- Belarus supports Ukraine as indivisible unitary state, ambassador says
- Brest government bans 18 anti-Lukashenka demonstrations
- Former presidential candidate appeals fine imposed for commemorating 19th century anti-Russian insurgents
- Providers of paid medical services banned from raising their prices
- Authorities scrap fee on foreign exchange purchase by legal entities
- United Kingdom’s Visa Application Center in Minsk moves into permanent office
- Minsk residents paying tribute to victims of Charlie Hebdo massacre in Paris
- Minsk adorned by New Year illumination
- Dzyady march ends with rally at Stalin-era massacre site
- Minsk hosts first-ever Belarusian-language sports festival
Dissident historian files appeal against refusal by district judge to hear her suit against Supreme Certification Commission
Historian Iryna Kashtalyan has filed an appeal with the Minsk City Court against the refusal by a district judge in Minsk to hear her suit against the Supreme Certification Commission, which had rejected her thesis for a doctoral candidate's degree.
The historian's dissertation examined the situation in Belarus shortly after World War II, including social stratification that created the groups of factory workers, farmers, intelligentsia, "traitors," war veterans and "westerners." It also looked into people's attitudes toward the Soviet authorities, shortages of essential goods and housing, the high crime rate during that period, and the issuance of residence permits by local authorities.
The Supreme Certification Commission concluded that the work "is intended to lead the reader to the conclusion that the Soviet state was not a natural mother but an evil, heartless stepmother for the Belarusian people and that the operation of this monster state contravened human nature."
In a letter that Ms. Kashtalyan received on July 7, Judge Ala Yashchanka of Minsk's Pershamayski District Court explains that the settlement of scientific disputes does not fall within the jurisdiction of courts.
As Ms. Kashtalyan told BelaPAN, her suit was not about any scientific disputes but about a specific violation by the Supreme Certification Commission of regulations governing the awarding of scientific degrees.
"By her ruling, the judge aimed to conceal from the public the disgraceful truth about the nature of the commission," she said. "The commission made its decision under the influence of a negative review that was of no scientific value and represented the personal emotional opinion of its anonymous author," Ms. Kashtalyan said, adding that she wants the judge's decision to be overturned and her case to be heard by the Pershamayski District Court.
According to Ms. Kashtalyan, although she cherishes no illusions, she would fight until all available remedies have been exhausted.
She insists that her dissertation was rejected because it described the post-war period in a different way than history textbooks currently in use.
When working on the dissertation, the postgraduate student at Belarusian State University used recently disclosed documents of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of Byelorussia. In September 2006, the University's council for the examination of dissertations on the history of Belarus unanimously approved the work by Ms. Kashtalyan.